PROMPT ARCADE
📖 Field Guide

Everything you need, nothing you don't.

The reference handbook. Pop in mid-level when stuck. Each section is anchored by what it changes about your prompt.

Why bother Sustainable AI Responsible AI PE 101 · 4D Framework Advanced techniques Discernment
01 · Foundation

Why learn prompt engineering?

AI tools are everywhere, but most professionals use them like they're DM-ing a junior colleague. Vague, contextless, then surprised when the output is mush. The shift: execution cost has dropped to near-zero. The value of your work now lives in the decisions you make: what to build, what to exclude, what to challenge.

Judgment

Direction over execution

You're not a typist anymore, you're a director. The prompt IS the work.

Compounding

It pays back

Each session makes the next faster. Better prompts today → better outputs forever.

Practice

It's a craft, not a hack

Plan, direct, refine, encode, shifting roles. Not a single skill, a practice.

02 · Sustainability

Sustainable prompting

Sustainable prompting isn't about writing shorter prompts, it's about writing smarter ones. More context upfront = fewer correction cycles = less total token spend. A 200-token prompt that produces a usable 300-token response is more sustainable than a 20-token prompt that triggers 5 rounds of 500-token corrections.

🔴 Inefficient
Vague prompt → long generic output → 3-5 corrections.
High token spend, low signal, output isn't reusable.
🟢 Sustainable
Front-loaded prompt → targeted output → 1 light refinement.
Lower token spend, high signal, prompt becomes a reusable template.
03 · Responsibility

Why use AI responsibly?

AI use should be effective and efficient, but also ethical and safe. Three diligences to anchor your practice:

Creation

Be intentional

Critically aware of which AI systems you use, how you work with them, and the impacts.

Transparency

Be open

Open about AI interactions with relevant stakeholders. Who needs to know? At what level of detail?

Deployment

Take responsibility

Verify facts, check for biases, ensure accuracy, and check usage rights before deploying.

04 · Fundamentals

PE 101 · The 4D Framework

Anthropic's core model: four interconnected competencies that work together, not in sequence.

01

Delegation

Decide which tasks to assign to AI, and how. Domain expertise is the foundation.

02

Description

Clearly define what you want. Context, format, audience, style, constraints.

03

Discernment

Critically evaluate what AI produces. A continuous loop of instruction and evaluation.

04

Diligence

Take responsibility for AI interactions and their impacts. Be rigorous and accountable.

Description has three flavours

Product

What you want

Output characteristics: context, format, audience, style, constraints.

Process

How to approach it

Should AI think step by step? Debate itself? Explore multiple paths before concluding?

Performance

How to behave

The behavioral aspects of the interaction. AI behaves differently in different contexts.

05 · Advanced

Six techniques that compound

Each addresses a specific failure mode in how AI processes instructions.

R

Define role, style, tone

Not "act like a designer" but "act as a senior product designer who has shipped AI features in regulated industries."

T

Ask AI to think first

"Before answering, think through the problem carefully. Consider constraints and approaches before recommending."

S

Break into steps

For complex tasks, number the steps. "1) do X, 2) compare Y, 3) highlight Z, 4) suggest reasons."

N

Negative constraints

Tell the model what NOT to do. "Do not jump to solutions, first help me align on the problem." The most underused.

O

Define output format

"Give me: a) key user needs, b) business goals, c) P0 features with rationale," not "a comprehensive response."

V

Ask for variations

"Give me 3 versions: conservative, balanced, aggressive, so I can compare directions."

06 · Discernment

Evaluating AI output

Discernment ensures AI collaboration remains guided by human judgment. Three lenses:

Product

Did it produce good work?

Factually accurate? Appropriate to audience? Coherent? Adds value?

Process

Did it reason well?

Watch for: logical inconsistency, lapses in attention, getting trapped in circular reasoning.

Performance

Did it behave right?

Communication style appropriate? Right level of detail? Response to feedback efficient?

The senior-level unlock

Chain-of-thought prompting. Add "Walk me through your reasoning before presenting the answer." For any ambiguous or high-stakes prompt, this dramatically improves output quality. The model is forced to show its work before concluding.

Go practice this →